SEMINARS, ANALYSING PRACTICES, IN THE PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF TEACHERS IN THE COUNTRIES OF THE WESTERN EUROPE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2017.6.169175Keywords:
clinic training, practices’ analysis, reflexive practitioner, teacher’s individualityAbstract
There have been displayed the researches of Western-European theorists and practitioners of pedagogical education about global clinic training which, in accordance to their view, should become the basis of all complex of modern pro- gram of professional teachers’ training in the article. Proceed from the fact that theoretical knowledge, accumulated out of action context, cannot be the one that is being mobilized for solving professional tasks, Western-European scientists consider teachers’ training as intensive analysis training of pedagogical reality by means of theoretical ideas. Within clinic form of study organizing, practice of the intending teacher is simultaneously the activity in composing theoretical concepts and new knowledge as well as the activity directed toward integration and mobilization and the acquired skills and competences.
Pointing out that clinic training is impossible to imagine in one unique scheme of methods, they point out five basis components in its organization. This research narrates about peculiarities of analysis practice seminars’ organizing as one the methods of the development and transformation of teacher’s individuality – reflexive practitioner. Having come to the conclusion that reflexive practice is more a matter of state than a distinct methodological competence, theorists and experts of pedagogical education of Western Europe state that the development of teachers’ individuality – reflexive practitioner occurs as a result of practice and intensive training where a student teacher has a number of cases to self- create general schemes of reflection and regulation, to find answers to all problematic questions. Educational supervisor plays coaching role in which he observes, sets goals, directs mental processes of the intending teacher. His functions are directed toward support and work regulation in self-analysis; these functions give intending teachers the opportunity to interpret their practices and professional behavior, and, in such a way, to gradually create, organize specific skills and competences, while taking into account everybody’s personal experience.
References
Про освіту : Закон України. Законодавчі акти України з питань освіти: За станом на 1 квітня 2004 року. Верховна Рада України; Комітет з питань науки і освіти / І. Р. Юхновський (ред.-упоряд.).
Офіційне видання. Київ : Парламентське вид-во, 2004. С. 21–52.
Харченко Т. Г. Розвиток особистості вчителя-рефлексивного практика як пріоритетна складова процесу гуманізації педагогічної освіти у Франції в другій половині ХХ століття. Вісн. Луган. нац. ун-ту імені Тараса Шевченка : Педагогічні науки. 2011. № 5(216). С. 138–152.
Харченко Т. Г. Клінічний підхід до формування особистості вчителя-рефлексивного практика у Франції.
Порівняльно-педагогічні студії : наук.-пед. журн. 2011. № 1(7). С. 145–152.
Харченко Т. Г. До питання про розвиток рефлексії над практикою та її сутністю у французькій педагогічній освіті. Вісн. Луган. нац. ун-ту імені Тараса Шевченка : Педагогічні науки. 2011. № 13(224). С. 193–202.
Altet M. Une formation professionnelle par l’analyse des pratiques et l’utilisation d’outils conceptuels issus de la re- cherche: modes cognitifs et modes d’ajustement. Les Siences de l’Éducation pour l’ère nouvelle. 1992. № 1–2.
Р. 27–58.
Altet M. Paquay L., Altet M., Charlier E., Perrenoud Ph.Les compétences de l’enseignant professionnel. Entre savoirs, schèmes d’action et adaptation : le savoir-analyser. Former des enseignants professionnels. Paris, Bruxelles : De Bœck Université, 1996. P. 27–40.
Altet M. L’analyse de pratiques : Une démarche de formation professionnalisante? Recherche et formation: Formes et dispositifs de la professionnalisation. 2000. № 35. Р. 25–39.
Blanchard-Laville C., Fablet D. L’analyse des pratiques professionnelles. Paris : L’Harmattan, 1996. 265 р.
Bussienne É., Tozzi М. Analysons nos pratiques professionnelles. Cahiers pédagogiques (septembre). 1996. № 346.
Р. 10–63.
Champy-Remoussenard P., Rothan В. De la mise en mots du travail à l’analyse des pratiques professionnelles : La formation d’étudiants de licence de Sciences de l’éducation. Recherche et formation: Formation continue des enseignants : les MAFPEN et Après. 1999. № 32. Р. 163–184.
Dias-Chiaruttini A. Former les enseignants au débat interprétatif : places et enjeux des styles enseignants. Repères : recherches en didactique du français langue maternelle. 2011. №44. doi: 10.4000/reperse.170.
Lamy M. et al. L’analyse des pratiques en vue du transfert des réussites. Paris : Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la recherche, 1996. 296 р.
Maillebouis M., Vascencellos M-D. Un nouveau regard sur l’action éducative : l’analyse des pratiques profession- nelles. Perspectives documentaires en éducation. 1997. № 41. P. 35–67.
Perrenoud Ph., Tardif M., Lessard C., Gauthier C. De l’alternance à l’articulation entre théories et pratiques dans la formation des enseignants. Formation des maîtres et contextes sociaux. Perspectives internationales. Paris : PUF, 1998. P. 153–199.
Perrenoud Ph. De l’analyse de l’expérience au travail par situations-problèmes en formation des enseignants. Triquet E., Fabre-Col C. Recherche (s) et formation des enseignants. Grenoble : IUFM, 1998. P. 89–105.
Perrenoud Ph. Développer la pratique réflexive dans le métier d’enseignant. Paris : ESF éditeur, 2001. 224 p.
Perrenoud Ph. Le travail sur l’habitus dans la formation des enseignants. Analyse des pratiques et prise de conscience. Former des enseignants professionnels: Quelles stratégies? Quelles compétences? Paquay L., Altet M., Charlier E., Perrenoud Ph. Bruxelles : De Bœck, 1996. P. 181–208.
The Law of Ukraine «On Education» of 1 April 2004 № 1060-XII. Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/1060-12 (ukr).
Kharchenko, T. H. (2011). Rozvytok osobystosti vchytelia-refleksyvnoho praktyka yak priorytetna skladova protsesu humanizatsii pedahohichnoi osvity u Frantsii v druhii polovyni XX stolittia [The Development of the teach- er’s individuality of reflexive practitioner as a prioritized component of humanization process of ped- agogical education in France in the second part of the 20th century]. Visnyk Luhans'koho nacional'noho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka: Pedaghoghichni nauky, 5(216), 138–152 (ukr).
Kharchenko, T. H. (2011). Klinichnyi pidkhid do formuvannia osobystosti vchytelia-refleksyvnoho praktyka u Frantsii [Clinical аapproach toward the formation of teacher’s individuality of the reflexive practitioner in France]. Porivnjaljno-pedaghoghichni studiji : nauk.-ped. zhurnal, 1(7), 145–152 (ukr).
Kharchenko, T. H. (2011). Do pytannia pro rozvytok refleksii nad praktykoiu ta yii sutnistiu u frantsuzkii pedahohichnii osviti [The description of reflection development in practice and its essence in French pedagogical education]. Visnyk Luhans'koho nacional'noho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka: Pedaghoghichni nauky, 13(224), 193–202 (ukr).
Altet, M. (1992). Une formation professionnelle par l’analyse des pratiques et l’utilisation d’outils conceptuels issus de la recherche: modes cognitifs et modes d’ajustement [Professional education on the basis of practice analysis and the usage of conceptual instruments of the scientific research]. Les Siences de l’Éducation pour l’ère nouvelle, 1–2, 27– 58 (fr).
Altet, M. (1996). Les compétences de l’enseignant professionnel. Entre savoirs, schèmes d’action et adaptation : le savoir- analyser [Competences of the professional educator. Between knowledge, action schemes and adaptation: the ability to analyze]. M. Altet (Ed.). Paris, Bruxelles, France: De Bœck Université, 27–40 (fr).
Altet, M. (2000). L’analyse de pratiques : Une démarche de formation professionnalisante? [Practice analysis : Pro- fessional academic process ?]. Recherche et formation: Formes et dispositifs de la professionnalisation, 35, 25–39 (fr).
Blanchard-Laville, C., & Fablet, D. (1996). L’analyse des pratiques professionnelles [The analysis of the professional pra- tice]. Paris, France: L’Harmattan (fr).
Bussienne, É., & Tozzi, M. (1996). Analysons nos pratiques professionnelles [We analyse our professional practice].
Cahiers pédagogiques (septembre), 346, 10–63 (fr).
Champy-Remoussenard, P., & Rothan, M. (1999). De la mise en mots du travail à l’analyse des pratiques profession- nelles: La formation d’étudiants de licence de Sciences de l’éducation [From theory to analysis of the profes- sional activity: Training of licentiate students in pedagogic]. Recherche et formation: Formation continue des enseignants: les MAFPEN et Après, 32, 163–184 (fr).
Dias-Chiaruttini, A. (2011). Former les enseignants au débat interprétatif: places et enjeux des styles enseignants [Teachers’ training to professional activity: different styles of teachers’ work]. Repères: recherches en didac- tique du français langue maternelle, 44. doi: 10.4000/reperse.170 (fr).
Lamy, M. et al. (1996). L’analyse des pratiques en vue du transfert des réussites [Practice analysis with the purpose of sharing experience]. Paris, France: Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la recherche (fr).
Maillebouis, M. (1997). Un nouveau regard sur l’action éducative : l’analyse des pratiques professionnelles [New ap- proach to educational action: the analysis of professional practice]. Perspectives documentaires en éducation, 41, 35–67 (fr).
Perrenoud, Ph. (1998). De l’alternance à l’articulation entre théories et pratiques dans la formation des enseignants [From alternation to theory connection with practice in the field of pedagogical education]. Ph. Perre- noud (Ed.). Paris, France: PUF, 153– 199 (fr).
Perrenoud, Ph., Triquet, E., & Fabre-Col, C. (1998). De l’analyse de l’expérience au travail par situations-problèmes en formation des enseignants [From experience analysis to work over problematic situations]. Recherche (s) et formation des enseignants, 89–105 (fr).
Perrenoud, Ph. (2001). Développer la pratique réflexive dans le métier d’enseignant [The development of reflexive prac- tice in teacher’s profession]. Paris, France: ESF éditeur (fr).
Perrenoud, Ph. (2011). Le travail sur l’habitus dans la formation des enseignants. Analyse des pratiques et prise de conscience [Work over habitus in teachers’ training. Practice analysis and understanding]. Former des ensei- gnants professionnels: Quelles stratégies? Quelles compétences? Ph. Perrenoud (Ed.). Bruxelles, Belgium: De Bœck, 181–208 (fr).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Тетяна Харченко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Content Licensing: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial
The author allows:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
