THEORY-METHODOLOGICAL BASES OF GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PROGNOSTICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2018.7.138144Keywords:
prognostication, development, general secondary educationAbstract
In the article, based on the analysis of the system of means of scientific cognition and critical understanding of the features of pedagogical prognostication as a specific type of scientific research and form of concretization of scientific prognostication, the results of pedagogical knowledge systematization prognostication highlighted. In the research format the ideas, theories, positions, patterns and principles that reflect the features of the object and subject of research scientifically interpreted.
It was clarified that the development of theoretical principles for forecasting the development of general secondary education is connected with solving problems of educational and pedagogical prognostication as a branch of pedagogical science and using an interdisciplinary approach to substantiating the strategy of its development; signs of the scientific process and the result of forecasting the development of general secondary education is the nature of purpose-setting, the distinction of a special object of forecasting, the use of his means of knowledge, the uniqueness of terms and concepts; for the construction of the conceptual image of a certain element of science (in the research format - the conceptual image of the institution of education), in addition to imperative arguments and emotional arguments, it is necessary to reveal and substantiate the main characteristics of pedagogical forecasting.
The links between studied pedagogical phenomena and processes reflected in the points of the Prediction Concept of General Secondary Education Development, program of the cyclical seminar «Theoretical and methodological fundamentals of preparing subjects of educational activity for the development of forecasts». This will facilitate the formation in subjects of government core, system-making views on the prospects for the development of general secondary education.
References
Gershunskij, B. S. (1986). Pedagogicheskaja prognostika : metodologija, teorija, praktika [Pedagogical prognostic: methodology, theory, practice]. Kiev, USSR: Vishha shkola (rus).
Ghoncharenko, S. U. (2010). Pedaghoghichni doslidzhennja: metodologhichni porady molodym naukovcjam [Pedagogical research: methodological advice for young scientists]. Kyiv- Vinnytsia, Ukraine: «Planer» (ukr).
Demchuk, V. S. (2007). Osnovy osvitnjogho menedzhmentu : posibnyk [Fundamentals of Educational Management: A Guide]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Lenvit (ukr).
Kremenja,V.Gh. (Ed.). (2008). Encyklopedija osvity [Encyclopedia of Education]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Jurinkom Inter (ukr).
Korshunov, A. M., & Mantatov, V. V. (1988). Dialektika social'nogo poznanija : posіbnik [Dialectics of Social Cognition: A Guide]. Moscow, USSR (rus).
Kraevskij, V. V. (2006). Metodologija pedagogiki: novyj etap: ucheb. posobie [Methodology of pedagogy: a new stage]. Moscow, Russian Federation: Akademija (rus).
Lednev, V. S. (1989). Soderzhanie obrazovanija: ucheb. posobie [Educational content]. Moscow, USSR: Vysshaja shkola (rus).
Lisichkin, V. A. (1972). Teorija i praktika prognostiki. Metodologicheskie aspekty : posіbnik [Theory and practice of prognostics. Methodological aspects: a textbook]. Moscow, USSR: Nauka (rus).
Nikitina, L. E. (Ed.). (2009). Pedagogicheskoe prognozirovanie: nauchno-metodicheskoe posobie [Pedagogical forecasting: a scientific and methodological manual]. Moscow, Russian Federation: NOU VPO Moskovskij psihologo-social'nyj institute (rus).
Novyj tlumachnyj slovnyk ukrajinsjkoji movy u trjokh tomakh [New explanatory dictionary of the Ukrainian language in three volumes] (2008). 3-j tom P-Ja. Kyiv, Ukraine: Akont (ukr).
Onyshhuk, L. A. (2016). Koncepcija proghnozuvannja rozvytku zaghaljnoji serednjoji osvity [Concept of forecasting development of general secondary education]. Kyiv, Ukraine (ukr).
Sysoieva, S. O. (2012). Sfera osvity iak ob'iekt doslidzhennia [The field of education as an object of research].
Osvitolohiya, 1. 22–29 (ukr).
Tokovenko, A. S. (1994). Jevoljucionnaja jepistemologija. Stanovlenie novoj filosofskoj paradigmy [Evolutionary epistemology. The formation of a new philosophical paradigm]. Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine (rus).
Fejerabend, P. (1986). Izbrannye trudy po istorii nauki [Selected Works on the History of Science]. Moscow, USSR (rus).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Людмила Онищук
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Content Licensing: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial
The author allows:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
